Criticism of Superstition in Seneca, Philo, and Clement of Alexandria

In this paper I will reflect on ancient Jewish, Christian and polytheistic concepts of superstitio from the perspective of the history of philosophy and cultural discourse analysis. Drawing on current scholarly discourse, I will analyse the criticisms that Seneca, Philo of Alexandria and Clement of Alexandria level at those who, rather out of irrational fear, believe that they are serving God in the right way. The analysis of the texts of the representatives of three different traditions shows how their traditions interact and how, beyond their differences in cultural, geographical, historical and even linguistic contexts, education plays a crucial role in their conception of what it means to be truly pious. Superstition, or δεισιδαιμονία, can only be combated through the knowledge of God and the correct interpretation of the ritual acts performed.