Sarah the “Gevirah:” A Comparison of Sarah and the Queen Mothers in the Matters of Succession

Abraham’s and Sarah’s struggle to produce a child is the first of the ancient Israelites’ struggle to claim the divine promise, individually and collectively. This struggle of the first patriarch and matriarch begins with Sarah’s barrenness and her resolve to find other means to produce an heir for Abraham and herself in Genesis 16. In the first nine verses, Sarah is referred to as Hagar’s “mistress” or “gevirah” three times (vv 4, 8, 9). Initially, there is little doubt for the reader to be concerned about any question of translation for the term “gevirah” as Sarah is the mistress of the servant Hagar. The reader, however, encounters a slight problem when one compares the other texts in which the term appears as it is most frequently applied to the queen mother. What becomes evident when one explores these texts and compares their meanings and contexts is that Sarah’s story corresponds to the majority of the contexts of the use of “gevirah” where succession of an heir is involved, which is that of the position of the queen mother. In order to demonstrate this similarity, I will first explore Sarah’s story where “gevirah” appears through to the securing of her son and Abraham’s heir, Isaac, all of which centers around the importance of succession. I will follow the story of Sarah the “gevirah” with how those women given the title of “gevirah” also acted in matters of succession. I will conclude with the implications of this comparison, which is that “mistress” is an inadequate translation of “gevirah” as the narrator’s choice of this appellation foreshadows Sarah as the chosen matriarch who will carry the promised heir and justify the actions she takes in order to secure the succession of her biological son.